Category Archives: Election ’16

Even bright lights can be absorbed into the black hole of neoconservative thinking.

I like Dana Loesch, but this is sophomoric stuff.

“Trump says he will ‘hire the best minds’ as president but according to the news items below, apparently did not vet his own business partners.”

Except that almost none of the cited stories indicate a lack of vetting on Trump’s part, unless you’re willing to accept the premise that mobsters and drug dealers couldn’t possibly also be good at other things. Guilt-by-association works alright if the second party is guilty in some way that figures into their relationship with the first. You go to a church to pray, so that Barack Obama spent 20 years attending services at a church whose pastor was praying “God damn America” from the pulpit is a much more significant connection than it would’ve been if the story read: “Jeremiah Wright, who is also a crackpot preacher, was once the foreman of a construction crew that Barack Obama hired.”

Which leads to another problem I have with this line of attack: Can you see Barack Obama ever hiring a construction crew? Yeah, neither can I, and for that matter it isn’t something I see Marco “el niño” Rubio doing, either. So if Dana’s standard is that you should keep your hands clean by just never doing anything, then, sure, I guess Trump’s failed it big time.

Continue reading Even bright lights can be absorbed into the black hole of neoconservative thinking.

Ode to Hillary

Benghazi, Bill’s ‘Bimbos’

Foundation money, Oh my…

Rogue servers, lists of enemies

Why Hill, Oh why?

‘It’s rigged!’ and you’ll fight!

(Sure, against guns and our rights…)

Cop killers and terrorists

To you they’re alright…

‘X Chromosomes matter!’ your campaign will state

But really, Hill, be truthful…

What difference does it make?

Wolves, lambs, and, sometimes, men.

I remember thoroughly enjoying the last New Jersey gubernatorial debate. Chris Christie spent the full ninety minutes mercilessly tearing his Democratic challenger, a woman from the NJ senate named Buono, into small shreds, and then shuffling them around the stage with his feet like dead leaves.

It was obvious to me then that Christie was adept at this. I was a bit surprised, therefore, to see that he was one of the five candidates from Fox’s recent 10-man prime-time debate whose poll numbers declined in its aftermath. I guess I oughtn’t have expected as much from him as I did: Looking back on it, Buono should’ve lost the debate had Christie not even shown up, so devastatingly bad was her performance. Out of many great moments to choose from (a dazzling cavalcade of nonsense which included such gems as the suggestion that Hurricane Sandy might never have happened if Christie had only done more to prevent global warming) my absolute favorite was when the poor woman opened her response to a panelist’s question which had included the phrase “passive resistance” with these exact words:

“I like that. ‘Passive resistance.’ I’m going to coin that phrase.”

In the pageantry of our politics, Christie was the wolf and Buono was the lamb. And while the ability to trounce a mental defective may not qualify Christie to compete against the big boys, it might at least teach the establishment something. Considering the two Fox debates, what’s really striking isn’t Christie’s comparative weakness, but the much more abject unsuitability of the establishment-backed candidates. Jeb Bush and Carly Fiorina (whose post-debate bounce was more aggressively spin-propelled than one of those rubber band and balsa wood airplanes) are sacrificial lambs in the mold of Mitt Romney. Continue reading Wolves, lambs, and, sometimes, men.